Ricardo Butlow — Law Firm

Construction defects

A delivered work is not always a finished work. A defect claim depends on technical proof and short timeframes.

A delivered work is not always a finished work. Leaks that appear at the first winter, cracks in recent walls, materials substituted without authorization, installations that fail months later: the client who discovers defects after delivery has a defined legal path — but one constrained by short timeframes and by the technical proof of the defect.

What construction defects are

Argentine law distinguishes between apparent defects — visible at the time of delivery, which must be observed at that moment — and hidden or redhibitory defects, which are not noticed at delivery and manifest later. Liability for defects coexists with decennial liability for ruin, but operates with different timeframes and remedies.

When a claim is the right move

A defect claim succeeds when there is a demonstrable defect, an open procedural window, and a clear defendant: builder, seller, or professional. The firm represents both the individual buyer and the consortium that discovers defects in common parts after taking delivery of the building.

Timeframes and opportunity

Timeframes are the first barrier to the claim. The acquirer must report the defect within sixty calendar days of detecting it, or loses the redhibitory action. Prescription runs on short periods for minor defects and extends when the defect compromises the soundness of the work. The first technical-legal step is therefore always to fix the date the defect manifested and to frame it within the applicable regime.

How we work a defect case

A construction defect case requires procedural speed and technical rigor. The firm integrates both from the first contact.

  1. Urgent inspection to fix the date the defect manifested and preserve the statutory window.
  2. Reliable notice to the builder, seller, or professional involved.
  3. Technical diagnosis of the defect, its cause, and its scope.
  4. Quantification of damages and of repair or replacement costs.
  5. Mandatory pre-trial mediation and, where appropriate, judicial claim.
  6. Follow-through during the expert report through to final judgment or settlement.

Possible outcomes

Depending on the magnitude of the defect and the position of the parties, the result can range from a price reduction or repair at the responsible party's expense to full rescission of the contract with refund of payments. Litigation is avoided when the technical evidence is well built and the claim is framed within timeframes. When the defect is discovered late, the strategy redirects toward decennial liability for ruin where the facts allow.

Need advice on Construction defects?

Let's talk about your case. We'll respond with the approach, the timelines, and the fees so you know exactly how to proceed.